Posts Tagged With: Amuda

Syrian Kurdish creative resistance in times of war

Syrian artists in the mainly Kurdish northeast are indulging in their newfound freedom to explore their art without regime restrictions. (In the photo: artist Amr Ferso poses next to his works in Amuda)

Syrian Artists Remain Creative on Margins of War


AMUDA, Syria — Living in Syria is not only about survival. For many Syrian artists, it means keeping creativity alive despite hardships and exploiting unprecedented freedom of expression. According to some artists, the revolution should not be limited to the removal of censorship, but by raising awareness on the most rooted social habits and taboos. Nevertheless, for the time being, most artists who wish to remain in Syria lack any form of institutional and economic support.

Walking around the streets of Amuda — 80 km (50 miles) from the front line between jihadists and Kurdish militias in Ras al-Ain — what goes hardly unnoticed is the large proportion of polyhedral artists, devoting their free time to a wide range of activities. It is common to meet a shopkeeper who is eager to read one of his poems or invite you to listen to him play the tambur (a Kurdish string instrument). This is partly because of the lack of specialization, but it is also the symptom of a thriving cultural scene. “Pablo Picasso used to say, ‘We are all born artists, but what’s important is how we preserve this art,'” Rishan Ali Yusef, a sculptor, told Al-Monitor. His day job is cutting marble plates in a factory.

Categories: Kurdistan, Syria | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The case for foreign intervention in Syria (Intervention als kleineres Übel)

An article I wrote for WOZ while there was big fuss about US military intervention in Syria. That was the time  when Western anti-war activists took the streets rejecting foreign intervention, regardless of their silence on the massacres perpetrated by the regime in Syria over the last two years and a half

Syria cannot wait for more red lines

By Andrea Glioti

(Amuda- Syria)

dont bomb syria



The use of chemical weapons in Syria, the umpteenth ‘red line’ drawn by Barack Obama to postpone any kind of intervention, seems to have been crossed by the regime once again on Wednesday 21 in the countryside of Damascus (al-Ghutha al-Sharqiya wa al-Gharbiya). There is a lack of consensus among experts on whether chemical weapons have been used or not and the UN inspectors have been allowed to visit the site only on Tuesday 27.

Regardless of chemical weapons, Syrian civilians have been slaughtered in countless ways over the last two years and a half, but this has not prompted a firm response from the international community.

The first harsh comments I heard upon my return to Syria last April were uttered by an old lady walking into a grocery in Amuda: “We thought you would have helped us, but you Europeans left us on our own.”

I heard the same bitter accusations in Damascus in 2011, when the uprising was mainly peaceful, and then from refugees scattered across Lebanon, Turkey and Iraqi Kurdistan.

“I believe every Syrian abroad should blow himself up and kill civilians,” suggests laughing a Syria Telecom employee in Amuda, “maybe the international community would start caring about the destruction of our country

What has been the response of the international community to the slaughter of Syrian civilians until today? The UN Security Council is paralyzed by the undemocratic veto system reserved to its five permanent members, so that Russia and China succeeded in blocking any escalation against Damascus. Sanctions didn’t undermine the repressive apparatus, due to the military and financial support of its numerous international allies. The course of diplomacy has failed: the UN envoy Lakhdar Brahimi  insists on the roadmap to the Geneva II peace talks, even if no date has been set after months of meetings and the regime is stubborn on Bashar al-Asad staying in power at least until the elections scheduled in 2014, a condition clearly rejected by the opposition.

In order to brush off the guilt of more than 100.000 Syrian victims, the international community (i.e.: the UN, but also NGOs and media) started employing the term “civil war”, that means a ‘general amnesty’ putting the regime and the rebels on the same level.

 It is worth noting that no one in Syria talks about a “civil war” (harb ahliyya), most accept the terms revolution (thawra), whereas those supporting the Government prefer talking about “events” (ahdath) or “crisis” (‘azma). The prevailing vision is that of a country sacrificed at the hands of an international plot (mu’amara). If the supporters of the regime phrase this conspiracy as aimed at weakening the allegedly anti-Israeli  Syrian axis of the “resistance” (muqawama), the opposition talks about a conspiracy aimed at settling scores (tasfiya al-hisabat) at the expense of civilians: the reference is in particular to those armed groups financed by regional powers and rooted abroad like Hizbullah, Al-Qa’ida and the Kurdish PKK, who rose to prominence in the second year of the uprising.

This is to say that the international community cannot turn its eyes away by labelling the bloodshed a “civil war”, as if it was an internal strife whose responsibility is entirely Syrian.

The main argument of those opposing a Lybia-styled no-fly zone- as no one is supporting a “boots on the ground” option, not even the American republicans- is that it would throw the country in the hands of Al-Qa’idist groups like Jabhat al-Nusra and the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). On the contrary, differently from Iraq, where the Shi’a Government installed by the American occupation provided Al-Qa’ida with the needed legitimacy, the rise of these experienced and well-funded groups at the expenses of moderate factions like the Free Syrian Army (FSA) in Syria has been a development of non-intervention and unbalanced warfare against a regime backed by the Iranian and Iraqi Shi’a Governments.

 “The regime sent ISIS here to eradicate the FSA,” told me a FSA commander in Ras al-‘Ayn, who is still fighting on the side of the ISIS against the Kurdish YPG (Popular Protection Units) affiliated to the PKK. Numerous Syrian dissidents accused the regime of having granted amnesty to radical Islamists in June 2011 in order to tarnish the reputation of the opposition: the FSA commanders are aware of the threat posed by the ISIS, but they prefer to avoid clashes before the overthrow of the regime.

The result of two years and a half of paralysis of the international community is that ideologically authoritarian militias like the ISIS and the YPG gained the upper hand in the liberated areas thanks to their military supremacy.

Those arguing against a no-fly zone stress how Libya descended into chaos after the NATO intervention, but is this slow-motion Syrian holocaust a better option? At least, a no fly-zone would extinguish the main source of civilian deaths: Government shelling. This is not meant to deny double standards on foreign intervention and that the US should also support Bahraini or Palestinian protesters, but Syria is left with two options to halt the massacre, due to the failure of the international community: Western military intervention or daily massacres consolidating the regime’s military supremacy, while it gains time from the preparation of sterile peace talks. Pragmatism is needed and a form of military intervention seems the lesser of two evils: those against it should come up with better options, as waiting is definitely not a good one.


18/3/2015 This piece came to my mind yesterday. Four years after the beginning of the Syrian uprising, I think my protracted staying inside Syria in 2013 and the prolonged paralysis of the international community in dealing with the Syrian tragedy prompted me to write this. Emotions played a role too: my undeniable empathy with the Syrian revolutionary cause. I still find hypocritical the position of those leftists who clearly sided with the Syrian regime under the pretext of ‘anti-imperialism’. Having said that, military interventions for humanitarian purposes are certainly biased and doomed to failure when they are unilaterally led by an imperialist force. In 2014, the US-led NATO coalition decided to intervene against ISIS, even though this organization clearly lags behind the Asad regime in terms of the civilian deaths caused in Syria. ISIS has been turned into the ideal boogeyman for the Western public, to the extent that there was no public outcry against the US intervention. Double standards? yes, and not only in the eyes of numerous Sunni Muslims. There is an urgent need to challenge the world powers’ hegemony on military interventions for humanitarian purposes (Russia falls in this category too, see Ukraine), but I cannot stand one-sided ‘stop the war’ coalitions and selective solidarity (see Kobane).

Categories: Syria | Tags: , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

27 June 2013: Syrian Kurdish YPG stifles dissent in Amuda by killing protesters

A piece I wrote from Amuda for Al-Monitor after the massacre occurred on June 27 in this city.

Syrian Kurdish Group Linked to PKK  Kills Protesters

amuda tenzif

AMUDA, Syria — “There are 35 million Kurds and only 30,000 of them live in Amuda. Now, if you have 35 kilograms of meat for a meal, you are not going to eat them because of a bunch of flies?” a Kurdish fighter with the Popular Protection Units (YPG) asked cynically while relaxing outside the military barracks. The Democratic Union Party (PYD) — the Syrian branch of the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) and the political affiliate of the YPG — has carefully consolidated its project to manage the Syrian Kurdish areas. It will not accept anyone interfering with its hegemony — especially if this happens ahead of the Geneva II conference, where the party has been promised a seat by Russia.

In Amuda, the PYD’s hegemony has become increasingly under threat from the pro-Free Syrian Army youth committees and other Kurdish parties, prompting its first military crackdown last week. Between June 27 and 28, seven civilians were gunned down by YPG forces following protests. According to witnesses, only one of them was armed. The United States issued a statement on Monday saying it was “appalled” by the PYD crackdown, calling on the PYD to “respect the human rights and dignity of all Syrians.”

Read more:

Categories: Kurdistan, Syria | Tags: , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The road to Kurdish autonomy still passes from Damascus

My first article from the province of Hasakeh (Syrian Kurdistan). It appeared on Al-Monitor on May 7. (follow the link to keep reading, unfortunately I cannot post the whole article here for copyright issues…)

Kurdish Group Gaining Autonomy
In Northern Syria


(photo from

QAMISHLI, Syria — Bilingual signs, “Western Kurdistan” (Rojava in Kurdish) on car license plates, Kurdish security forces (Asayish), Kurdish courts, municipalities, flags, unions and schools teaching Kurdish. This is the new look of the Kurdish-majority Syrian northern regions, the outcome of the withdrawal of regime security forces in July 2012 and the result of a delicate coexistence between Baathist and Kurdish institutions.

Syrian Kurds now have the chance to reap the benefits from the stalemate between the regime and the Arab opposition. But all this would not have been possible without a certain degree of connivance with the regime by the main Kurdish militia on the ground — the Democratic Union Party (PYD), which is affiliated with the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK). Regardless of the de facto autonomy achieved and the growing popularity of the PYD, some fear the authoritarian features of the party’s agenda.

Read more:

Categories: Kurdistan, Syria, Turkey | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Create a free website or blog at

Düzce Umut Atölyesi

Birlikte Mücadele, Birlikte Tasarım

Diario di Siria

Blog di Asmae Dachan "Scrivere per riscoprire il valore della vita umana"


Update on Syria revolution -The other side of the coin ignored by the main stream news


Sguardi Globali da una Finestra di Cucina al Ticinese


Views on anthropological, social and political affairs in the Middle East


A blog about understanding humanity- by G. Marranci, PhD


Views on anthropological, social and political affairs in the Middle East


"... chi parte per Beirut e ha in tasca un miliardo..."

Tutto in 30 secondi

[was] appunti e note sul mondo islamico contemporaneo

Anna Vanzan

Views on anthropological, social and political affairs in the Middle East

letturearabe di Jolanda Guardi

Ho sempre immaginato che il Paradiso fosse una sorta di biblioteca (J. L. Borges)